Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012

State v. S. M.

State v. S. M.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided November 21, 2012 · Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
253 Or. App. 598; 291 P.3d 798; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1351

State v. S. M.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.