Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013

State v. C. E. K.

State v. C. E. K.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 6, 2013 · Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
255 Or. App. 179; 296 P.3d 624

State v. C. E. K.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself or others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree with and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.