Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013

State v. M. Q.

State v. M. Q.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided November 27, 2013 · Duncan, Schuman, Wollheim
259 Or. App. 651; 314 P.3d 1003

State v. M. Q.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence any of the bases for commitment under ORS 426.005. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.