Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014

State v. S. L.

State v. S. L.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided June 11, 2014 · Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto
263 Or. App. 560; 328 P.3d 822

State v. S. L.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.