Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014

State v. R. J. H.

State v. R. J. H.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided November 19, 2014 · Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey
267 Or. App. 116; 340 P.3d 142; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698

State v. R. J. H.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.