Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Migis v. AutoZone, Inc., 286 Or. App. 357 (2017)
398 P.3d 360; 2017 WL 2664803; 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 792
Devore, Garrett, Ortega
Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., petitions for reconsideration of our decision, Migis v. AutoZone, Inc., 282 Or App 774, 387 P3d 381 (2016), concerning the disposition of its appeal. Defendant argues that concepts of waiver or invited error should preclude a new trial on the off-the-clock claim penalties and compel a defense verdict on that issue as a matter of law. We allow the petition for reconsideration to state that we reject those arguments. Without further discussion, we adhere to our original decision.
Reconsideration allowed; former disposition adhered to.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael MIGIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent v. AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published