Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Migis v. AutoZone, Inc., 286 Or. App. 357 (2017)
398 P.3d 360; 2017 WL 2664803; 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 792
Devore, Garrett, Ortega

Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., petitions for reconsideration of our decision, Migis v. AutoZone, Inc., 282 Or App 774, 387 P3d 381 (2016), concerning the disposition of its appeal. Defendant argues that concepts of waiver or invited error should preclude a new trial on the off-the-clock claim penalties and compel a defense verdict on that issue as a matter of law. We allow the petition for reconsideration to state that we reject those arguments. Without further discussion, we adhere to our original decision.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition adhered to.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael MIGIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent v. AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published