State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)
State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)
423 P.3d 176; 293 Or. App. 113
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)
Opinion of the Court
*114Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues that the record lacked sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. The state concedes that "the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of his mental disorder, appellant was a danger to self or unable to provide for his basic needs" and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.