Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019

City of Eugene v. Faerold

City of Eugene v. Faerold
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided January 3, 2019 · Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock
432 P.3d 394; 295 Or. App. 572 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

City of Eugene v. Faerold

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

*573Defendant, who was convicted of second-degree animal neglect in the Eugene Municipal Court, appealed to the circuit court where she was again convicted after a trial de novo . Defendant now appeals her conviction to this court. "Under ORS 221.360, when a defendant has been convicted in municipal court, and then convicted in circuit court following a trial de novo , we have jurisdiction to review the circuit court judgment only if the defendant is challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance he was convicted of violating." City of Eugene v. Smyth , 239 Or. App. 175, 181, 243 P.3d 854 (2010), rev. den. , 350 Or 230, 253 P.3d 1079 (2011) (emphasis added). Because, on appeal, defendant does not challenge the constitutionality of the ordinance she was convicted of violating, *395we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal and, accordingly, we dismiss.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.