Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019

Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)

Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided July 24, 2019 · James, Ortega, Shorr
444 P.3d 1148; 298 Or. App. 552 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

*553Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a *554period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is a "person with mental illness." ORS 426.005(1)(f). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support appellant's commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.