State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)
State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)
446 P.3d 579; 299 Or. App. 117
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)
Opinion of the Court
*118Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Department of [Multnomah] County Human Services for a period not to exceed one year. He contends that the trial court erred in finding that, due to an intellectual disability, appellant was a danger to others. See ORS 427.215 ; ORS 427.005(10). The state concedes that the record does not include clear and convincing evidence that appellant's intellectual disability caused him to be a danger to others at the time of the commitment hearing. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.