Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021

State v. Deprati

State v. Deprati
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided May 19, 2021
311 Or. App. 620; 487 P.3d 58

State v. Deprati

Opinion

Submitted December 17, 2020; portion of judgment imposing $100 bench proba- tion fee reversed, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed May 19, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERICK WAYNE DEPRATI, Defendant-Appellant.

Lane County Circuit Court 15CR37302; A171806 487 P3d 58

Charles M. Zennaché, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Stacy M. Du Clos, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM Portion of judgment imposing $100 bench probation fee reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite as 311 Or App 620 (2021) 621 PER CURIAM Appealing a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, defendant contends that the trial court erroneously terminated diver- sion and entered judgment pursuant to his plea. For the reasons stated in State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722 (2021), ORS 138.105(5) bars review of that contention.

Defendant also assigns error to the imposition of a $100 bench probation fee without announcing it in open court at sentencing. The state correctly concedes the error. State v. Baccaro, 300 Or App 131, 137, 452 P3d 1022 (2019).

Portion of judgment imposing $100 bench probation fee reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.