Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021

State v. Wymer

State v. Wymer
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided July 21, 2021
313 Or. App. 490; 491 P.3d 99

State v. Wymer

Opinion

Argued and submitted December 18, 2020; convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed July 21; petition for review denied November 24, 2021 (368 Or 788)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TODD ALLAN WYMER, Defendant-Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court 18CR78463; A171738 491 P3d 99

Ricardo J. Menchaca, Judge.

Adam L. Dean argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F.

Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.

PER CURIAM Convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite as 313 Or App 490 (2021) 491 PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of five criminal counts.

Defendant requested a unanimous verdict instruction, but the trial court gave a nonunanimous verdict instruction. On Counts 1 and 2, the jury verdicts were nonunanimous. We reverse and remand those counts. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020). On Counts 3, 4, and 5, the jury verdicts were unanimous. We affirm those counts. State v. Ciraulo, 367 Or 350, 478 P3d 502 (2020), cert den, ___ US ___, 141 S Ct 2836, 210 L Ed 2d 950 (2021).

We reject without written discussion defendant’s remaining assignments of error.

Convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.