State v. Taylor
State v. Taylor
Opinion
Argued and submitted May 29, 2020; reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed Juy 21, 2021
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN HOWARD TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court 18CR48676; A169670 491 P3d 89
Ricardo J. Menchaca, Judge.
Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.
E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.* PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
______________ * Tookey, J., vice DeVore, J.
Cite as 313 Or App 488 (2021) 489 PER CURIAM In this criminal appeal, we write to accept the state’s concession of an argument in defendant’s fourth assignment of error. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the crime for which defendant was convicted—attempted fourth-degree assault—is a Class A misdemeanor. Defendant posits—and the state agrees—that the trial court was required to enter a judgment of convic- tion for a Class B misdemeanor. Because we agree with the parties (without stating the specifics of the circumstances), we reverse the judgment and remand so that the trial court can enter a conviction of attempted fourth-degree assault as a Class B misdemeanor. We reject defendant’s remaining assignments of error without discussion.
Reversed and remanded; remanded for resentenc- ing; otherwise affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.