Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021

State v. Avila

State v. Avila
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided August 11, 2021
313 Or. App. 809; 492 P.3d 640; 313 Or. App. 798; 492 P.3d 1289

State v. Avila

Opinion

Submitted June 4, reversed and remanded August 11, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALEX MAGANA AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court 19CR47798; A173239 492 P3d 1289

Patricia Crain, Senior Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded.

Cite as 313 Or App 798 (2021) 799 PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine based on evi- dence found in defendant’s backpack after police stopped a vehicle in which he was riding. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evi- dence found in the backpack because the police seized the backpack without a lawful basis, thereby violating Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion, because the police did not have a lawful justification for seizing the back- pack, which was not connected to the investigation that was being conducted and that defendant had tried to leave in the vehicle. We agree with and accept the state’s concession, and we therefore reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.