Hejazi v. Eugene Police Dept. (A175305)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Chasteen v. Smith (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT and City of Eugene,
Defendants.
Lane County Circuit Court
20AD0013; A175305 495 P3d 754
R. Curtis Conover, Judge.
Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se.
Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed.
Cite as 314 Or App 618 (2021) 619 PER CURIAM
As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60, 898 P2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff’s service fees. Plaintiff’s opening brief, however, contains no argu- ment, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818), 314 Or App 1, 496 P3d 1073 (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant’s brief contained no pertinent argument).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.