Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021

State v. Rosas-Cabildo

State v. Rosas-Cabildo
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 9, 2021
314 Or. App. 476; 495 P.3d 217

State v. Rosas-Cabildo

Opinion

Submitted July 23, affirmed September 9, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ODILON ROSAS-CABILDO, Defendant-Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court 18CR10908; A171705 495 P3d 217

Oscar Garcia, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before James, Presiding Judge, and Kamins, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM Affirmed.

Cite as 314 Or App 476 (2021) 477 PER CURIAM Defendant challenges his convictions for multiple sexual offenses, raising three assignments of error. We affirm.

On defendant’s first assignment of error, we are not persuaded that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte enter a judgment of acquittal on a count of first- degree sexual abuse. Defendant’s second and third assign- ments of error challenge the trial court’s nonunanimous instruction to the jury. However, because the verdict was unanimous, defendant’s arguments are foreclosed by State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292, 478 P3d 515 (2020), and State v. Kincheloe, 367 Or 335, 478 P3d 507 (2020), cert den, ___ US ___, 141 S Ct 2837, 210 L Ed 2d 951 (2021).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.