State v. Thompson (A181067)
State v. Thompson (A181067)
Opinion
12 July 24, 2024 No. 507 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTHONY JOSEPH THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Yamhill County Circuit Court 22CN04257; A181067 Cynthia L. Easterday, Judge.
Submitted June 14, 2024.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Bruce A. Myers, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 334 Or App 12 (2024) 13 LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals from a general judgment of con- tempt. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991).
The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b).
We affirm.1 After violating a restraining order, defendant admit- ted to two counts of contempt of court and the trial court imposed punitive sanctions, ORS 33.065. The trial court sentenced defendant to 30 days in jail. Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, see ORS 138.105, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.