State v. Stanford
State v. Stanford
Opinion
18 July 24, 2024 No. 510 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEVIN RONALD STANFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court 23CR12461; A181390 Christopher R. Brauer, Judge.
Submitted June 14, 2024.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kristin A. Carveth, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 334 Or App 18 (2024) 19 LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass in the first degree, ORS 164.255. The trial court sentenced defendant to 24 months of probation and ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $3,583.94. His appointed coun- sel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, see ORS 138.105, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.