780 October 30, 2024 No. 780 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HAYLEY LADALE PETTS, Defendant-Appellant.

Lincoln County Circuit Court 19CR04414; A182106 Sheryl Bachart, Judge.

Submitted September 13, 2024.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emma McDermott, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.

Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.

EGAN, J.

Affirmed.

Nonprecedential Memo Op: 335 Or App 780 (2024) 781 EGAN, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation.

Defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 In 2019, defendant pleaded guilty to third-degree assault (Count 6) and prostitution (Count 14), and the trial court placed defendant on probation. In July 2023, the trial court found defendant in violation of the terms of her pro- bation for failing to report as directed. Defendant admitted the violation. The trial court revoked probation on Count 6 and sentenced defendant to 180 days in jail, with credit for time served, and two years of post-prison supervision. On Count 14, the trial court reinstated probation and extended it to April 2027.

Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, see ORS 138.105(5), we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.

Affirmed.

As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).