State v. G. P.
State v. G. P.
Opinion
No. 775 October 30, 2024 769 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of G. P., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. G. P., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court 24CC00395; A183417 Erin E. Kirkwood, Judge.
Submitted September 13, 2024.
Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
770 State v. G. P. LAGESEN, C. J.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment commit- ting him to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days and prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 The trial court entered that judgment after finding that appellant suffered from a mental disorder and was dan- gerous to others. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the civil commitment hearing, and the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.