Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2025

State v. Wilhelm

State v. Wilhelm
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided June 11, 2025
341 Or. App. 302

State v. Wilhelm

Opinion

302 June 11, 2025 No. 539 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NICHOLAS KEATON WILHELM, Defendant-Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court 23CR25941; A183038 Eric Butterfield, Judge.

Submitted May 13, 2025.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Anna R. Johnson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services/Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.

Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and Pagán, Judge.

PER CURIAM Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Nonprecedential Memo Op: 341 Or App 302 (2025) 303 PER CURIAM Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045. He contends that the trial court erred when it included in the judg- ment a term ordering him to pay “any required per diem fees” without pronouncing that term at sentencing. The state concedes the error and agrees that the case should be remanded for resentencing. We accept the concession and remand for resentencing. See State v. Barr, 331 Or App 242, 244, 246, 545 P3d 772, rev den, 372 Or 720 (2024) (holding that “[t]he trial court erred by including a previously unan- nounced term in the sentencing judgment,” and remanding for resentencing).

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.