State v. Freeman
State v. Freeman
Opinion
62 December 24, 2025 No. 1110 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTHONY LAGRANT FREEMAN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court 24CR44471; A185921 Kamala H. Shugar, Judge.
Submitted November 14, 2025.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emily P. Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 346 Or App 62 (2025) 63 LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction entered after defendant pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter with a firearm and first-degree robbery with a firearm. The trial court imposed a stipulated sentence of 240 months in prison on the manslaughter conviction and 90 months in prison with 36 months of post-prison supervision on the rob- bery conviction. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
See ORS 138.105(5) (“The appellate court has no authority to review the validity of the defendant’s plea of guilty or no con- test, or a conviction based on the defendant’s plea of guilty or no contest[.]”); ORS 138.105(9) (“The appellate court has no authority to review any part of a sentence resulting from a stipulated sentencing agreement between the state and the defendant.”).
Affirmed.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.