State v. Nava

No. 250 April 1, 2026 179 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIC NAVA, Defendant-Appellant.

Umatilla County Circuit Court 19CR72207, 20CR55793; A185512 (Control), A185513 Joanna A. Marikos, Judge.

Submitted February 13, 2026.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Joel Duran, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.

Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.

EGAN, J.

Affirmed.

180 State v. Nava EGAN, J.

In this consolidated appeal, defendant appeals from two judgments revoking probation and imposing concurrent sentences of 180 days’ incarceration and two years of post- prison supervision. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 Defendant pled guilty to first degree theft in Case No. 19CR72207 and two counts of manufacturing or deliver- ing a controlled substance in Case No. 20CR55793. He was sentenced to 24 months of probation in both cases. In both cases, the court imposed a condition of probation requiring defendant to “Report to Umatilla County Corrections imme- diately * * * following sentencing or release from custody.”

Defendant was arrested two years after he was released and admitted to having failed to report as directed. Defendant’s probation was revoked in both cases, and he was sentenced to 180 days’ incarceration and two years of post-prison supervision to run concurrently.

Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.

Affirmed.

As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel.