Berland and Berland (A183988)

730 April 22, 2026 No. 329 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of the Marriage of Lee-Ann BERLAND, Petitioner-Respondent, and Michael Paul BERLAND, Respondent-Appellant.

Deschutes County Circuit Court 21DR17604; A183988 Alicia N. Sykora, Judge.

Argued and submitted March 11, 2026.

Ruth A. Casby argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief were Janet M. Schroer and Hart Wagner LLP. On the opening brief was Helen C. Tompkins.

Andrew W. Newsom argued the cause for respondent.

Also on the brief was Holtey Brown Newsom, LLC.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and Hellman, Judge.

PER CURIAM Affirmed.

Nonprecedential Memo Op: 348 Or App 730 (2026) 731 PER CURIAM Husband appeals a judgment entered after a disso- lution trial that ordered property division, an equalization award to wife, child support to husband, and spousal sup- port to wife. On appeal, husband raises numerous assign- ments of error which challenge the trial court’s determi- nations on the property division, equalization award, and spousal support.

To find in husband’s favor, we would have to dis- avow the proceedings below because husband’s appellate presentation is based on a factual narrative that runs counter to the record and to the trial court’s expressed and implied findings. Husband did not request de novo review, and we are unpersuaded by counsel’s assertion at oral argu- ment that any of the trial court’s findings are contradicted by the record. Indeed, having reviewed the record in light of the correct standards of review, we find the trial court’s findings, legal reasoning, and ultimate decisions to be well- supported. We thus conclude that husband has not identified any reversible error on appeal.

Affirmed.