Ely / Cox / Garcia / Pingel v. Oregon Health Authority
Opinion
376 May 6, 2026 No. 392 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Erika ELY, Petitioner, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Respondent.
Office of Administrative Hearings 2020OHA11978; A175618 (Control) Julia COX, Petitioner, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Respondent.
Oregon Health Authority 2020OHA11942; A175967 ANALAURA MATA GARCIA, Petitioner, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Respondent.
Oregon Health Authority 2020OHA12190; A176470 Rachel PINGEL, Petitioner, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Respondent.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 349 Or App 376 (2026) 377 Oregon Health Authority 2020OHA12152; A176056 Argued and submitted March 22, 2024; on respondent’s motion to dismiss filed November 16, 2022, petitioners’ response filed January 30, 2023, and respondent’s reply filed February 15, 2023.
Hermine Hayes-Klein argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.
Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F.
Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Pagán, Judge.* PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. Haugen v. Oregon Health Authority, ___ Or App ___, ___ P3d ___ (May 6, 2026).
______________ * Lagesen, C. J., vice Mooney, S. J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.