IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

LANCE A. BRITTON, No, 1:15-cr-02086-CL ORDER Plaintiff, v. KLAMATH COUNTY, et al, Defendants, AIKEN, District Judge.” Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke has filed his Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) (doc. 144) recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 93) and motion to strike (doc. 101) should be GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion for default judgment (doc. 98), motion for reconsideration (doc. 108), and five other miscellaneous motions (docs, 104, 105, 111, 129, 188) should be DENIED. The case is now before this Court. See

(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff has filed timely objections (doc. 150) to the F&R, and defendants have filed a timely response. (doc. 151). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See

(b)(1); McDonnell Page 1- ORDER

Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1981), cert denied,

(1982). Having reviewed the entire file of this case, the Court finds no error in the F&R. Thus, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Clarke’s F&R (doc. 144) in its entirety. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion to strike are GRANTED. Plaintiffs motions (docs. 98, 104, 105, 108, 111, 120, 129, and 138) are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the F&R. Plaintiffs motion to open discovery (doc. 158) is denied as moot. Accordingly, this case is dismissed, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 3rd day of September 2019. Che United States District Judge

Page 2 - ORDER