Pounds v. Smith

IN THE USNTIATTEDEDIS S TRCIOCUTR T FORT HED ISTROIFC TO REGON EUGENDEI VISION VAN POUNDS., CasNe9 <3.1:9 �Gv-004:2:0-M ORDER Plaintiff, v. CA1vIEROSNM ITiHn,d iviadnuda lly inh iosf ficciaapla BcRiItAyLN;I GHT, indiviadnuidanh l ilsy official capacity; anOdR EGODNE PARTMEONFT CONSU:NIEBRU SAINNDES SESR VICES, Defendant.

AIKEDNi.s tJruidcgte : MagistlVrIautseKt aasfau bhhaafisil ehdiF si ndianngdRs e commendation ("F&(R'd'o)3c ).r ec1ommetnhdaidtne gfe nda1\tnitostt'io Do ins m(idsos8c ). be grantTehdic.sa sineso bwe fomree.S e 2e8 U .S§.6 C3.6 (b)a(nlFd)e (dRB..C) i Pv..

72(b).

Wheeni tphaerrot byj etcoat nspy o rtoifao m na gisjturdagtFee&' Rst, h e distcroiumcrutts m ta kaed en ovdae termionfta htapitoo rnto ifto hne magistra judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Plaintiff has filed timely objections (doc. 15) to the F&R and defendant's have filed a timely response to those objections. (doc. 16) Thus, this Court reviews the F&R de novo.

Having reviewed the objections as well as the entire file of this case, the Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s F&R. Accordingly, the Court adopts the F&R (do. 13) in its entirety. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.

It is so ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2019.

Oss. Che Ann Aiken United States District Judge Pasa 9... ORTNRR