IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON THE BANK OF NEW YOUR MELLON No. 3:16-cv-02012-AC FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWMBS 2004-25), Plaintiff, v.

ROGER H. HUMBARGER, et al., ORDER Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#67) on August 1, 2019, in which he recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and deny the request by Defendants Roger and Carolyn Humbarger, contained in their response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, for summary judgment on their elder abuse and exploitation counterclaim. The matter is now before me pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna- 1 - ORDER Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [67]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [42] is denied. The request by Defendants Roger and Carolyn Humbarger for summary judgment as to their elder abuse and exploitation claim, which was contained within their response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, is also denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2019.

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge

2 - ORDER