Hoyle v. Shelton
Hoyle v. Shelton
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CASEY MICHAEL HOYLE,
Civ. No. 2:16-cv-1800-MK Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
DR. SHELTON; RN ROBERTS; RN MANEY; DR. KELLY; DR. BEAMER; NP FISHER; NP LOZIER; MS WETTLAUFER; DR. SNIDER; RN GILLESPIE; MS. SHAW,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 112), and the matter is now before me. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 1 –ORDER Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 112) is adopted in full. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 14th day of November, 2019.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown