Pearson v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Pearson v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

NICHOLAS D. PEARSON,

Civ. No. 6:19-cv-1621-MK Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5), and the matter is now before me. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is adopted in part. Although Plaintiff clarified he no longer receives disability, his objections demonstrate leave to amend would be futile. The objections clearly indicate the complaint fails to state any cognizable claim. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. All pending motions or applications are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 20th day of December, 2019.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown