Pritchett v. Fairley

District Court, D. Oregon

Pritchett v. Fairley

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

COREY PRITCHETT,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:15-cv-1724-MK

v. ORDER

OFFICER FAIRLEY, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98) is adopted. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of January, 2020.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown