Pritchett v. Fairley
Pritchett v. Fairley
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
COREY PRITCHETT,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:15-cv-1724-MK
v. ORDER
OFFICER FAIRLEY, et al.,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98) is adopted. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of January, 2020.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown