Jansen v. Deschutes County Sheriff's Office
Jansen v. Deschutes County Sheriff's Office
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CRYSTAL JANSEN,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:17-cv-1276-MK
v. ORDER
DESCHUTES COUNTY and L. SHANE NELSON, an individual,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 90), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 90) is adopted. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part as stated in the report. The deadline to consent to Magistrate Judge Kasubhai trying this matter is January 31, 2020. With full consent, the case will be remain with Judge Kasubhai for trial. If any party does not consent, the case will be reassigned to Judge McShane for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of January, 2020.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown