IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

G. PENA-CARRILLO, No. 2:18-cv-00708-SB

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

CORRECTIONS OFFICER MOORE,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [43] on December 20, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies [30]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [43]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [30] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED _____J_a_n_u_a_r_y_ _9_, _2_0_2_0_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge