Audubon Society of Portland v. Jewell

District Court, D. Oregon

Audubon Society of Portland v. Jewell

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

AUDOBAN SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, et al., 1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) 1:17-cv-98-CL (trailing) Plaintiffs, 1:17-cv-468-CL (trailing) 1:17-cv-531-CL (trailing) v. JUDGMENT RYAN ZINKE, et al.,

Defendants.

TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendant-Intervenors. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Numerous parties filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. 1 –ORDER v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215) is adopted. Motions and cross-motions for summary judgment ## 143, 146, 157, 159, 161, and 162 are GRANTED. Motion # 148 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The remaining motions,

including motion to strike # 232, are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 6th day of April, 2020.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown