United States v. Chapman
United States v. Chapman
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-01139-CL
v. ORDER
STEPHEN L. CHAPMAN; JEANNETTE A. FRY; JACKSON COUNTY,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#29), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo.1 United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#29) is adopted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (#25) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 29th day of April, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
1 The United States filed a Notice (#30) stating it would not schedule any sale of the property without leave of the Court and will not move for such an order before July 15, 2020. 1 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown