United States v. Chapman

District Court, D. Oregon

United States v. Chapman

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-01139-CL

v. ORDER

STEPHEN L. CHAPMAN; JEANNETTE A. FRY; JACKSON COUNTY,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#29), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo.1 United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#29) is adopted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (#25) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 29th day of April, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

1 The United States filed a Notice (#30) stating it would not schedule any sale of the property without leave of the Court and will not move for such an order before July 15, 2020. 1 – ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown