Watts v. Decker

District Court, D. Oregon

Watts v. Decker

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JERRAD WATTS, an individual,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:17-cv-1081-MK

v. ORDER

KELVIN RAY DECKER, an individual residing in Coos County, Oregon; and the FISHING VESSEL #5, an ocean going fishing vessel hailing from Newport, Oregon,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#31), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo.1 United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is

1 After the time to file objections passed, Plaintiff filed a proposed judgment (#33). There, plaintiff requests post judgment interest of 9%. Under

28 U.S.C. § 1961

, interest is calculated at the 1 year treasury yield for the calendar week before entry of the judgment. That rate is .15%. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart- center/interest-rates/pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield (last visited May 14, 2020). 1 – ORDER correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#31) is adopted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment (#20) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of May, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 – ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown