Watts v. Decker
Watts v. Decker
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JERRAD WATTS, an individual,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:17-cv-1081-MK
v. ORDER
KELVIN RAY DECKER, an individual residing in Coos County, Oregon; and the FISHING VESSEL #5, an ocean going fishing vessel hailing from Newport, Oregon,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#31), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo.1 United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is
1 After the time to file objections passed, Plaintiff filed a proposed judgment (#33). There, plaintiff requests post judgment interest of 9%. Under
28 U.S.C. § 1961, interest is calculated at the 1 year treasury yield for the calendar week before entry of the judgment. That rate is .15%. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart- center/interest-rates/pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield (last visited May 14, 2020). 1 – ORDER correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#31) is adopted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment (#20) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of May, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown