Lowry v. Amsberry
Lowry v. Amsberry
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD THOMAS DENTON LOWRY, Case No. 2:17-cv-00702-CL Petitioner, ORDER
v. MS. BRIDGETT AMSBERRY, Superintendent, TRCI Respondent.
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 48), and the matter is now before this Court on Petitioner’s objections. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). [review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 48) is adopted in full. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. This Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
1 -ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 18th day of June, 2020.
_s/Michael J. McShane_______________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown