Pittmann v. Basarada

District Court, D. Oregon

Pittmann v. Basarada

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOSEPH KEITH PITTMANN,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:19-cv-1958-CL

v. ORDER

OFFICER DANIEL BASARADA, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#16), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1445

(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#16) is adopted. Plaintiff’s claims against Lisa Donnell, Lane County, the City of Eugene, and the City of Springfield are DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 17th day of June, 2020.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown