Pittmann v. Basarada
Pittmann v. Basarada
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JOSEPH KEITH PITTMANN,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:19-cv-1958-CL
v. ORDER
OFFICER DANIEL BASARADA, et al.,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#16), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#16) is adopted. Plaintiff’s claims against Lisa Donnell, Lane County, the City of Eugene, and the City of Springfield are DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 17th day of June, 2020.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown