C. v. Department of Human Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

J.C. and K.C., Minor Children, by and No. 3:19-cv-01739-AC through JAMES SHIKANY, Guardian Ad Litem of J.C. and K.C, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Human Services; SHIRLEY VOLLMULLER, in her individual capacity; JOHN P. MOSSER, in his individual capacity; TRISSA SCHIFFNER, in her individual capacity; KATHLEEN MCLAIN, in her individual capacity; JENNIFER RICKS, in her individual capacity; MARGARET STEINER, in her individual capacity; SCOTT NOON, in his individual capacity; and CAMPBELL STEWART, in her individual capacity, Defendants.

/// HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [ECF 53] on June 15, 2020, in which he recommends the Court deny Defendant Schiffner’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [ECF 31]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [ECF 53]. Accordingly, Defendant Schiffner’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [ECF 31] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________J_u_ly_ _2_3_,_ 2_0_2__0____.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge