IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DENNIS JAY WARREN, Case No. 3:18-cv-1751-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

WA. CO. SHERIFF’S OFFICE; LT. CAPRICE MASSEY; SGT. S. SIEMILLER; B. COLLINS; NAPHCARE, INC.,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [68] on July 21, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court grant defendants’ motions for summary judgment [43, 46] and dismiss all claims without prejudice. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [68]. Accordingly, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment [43, 46] are GRANTED and all claims are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________A__u_g_u_s_t_ 2_6_,_ 2__0_2_0_______________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge