Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MICHAEL J. HERNANDEZ; No. 2:19-cv-0508-SU ILANA HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

WALMART INC.,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [ECF 25] on July 23, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Magistrate Judge’s Order to Show Cause [ECF 24]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of

Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings and Recommendation [ECF 25]. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______A_u_g_u_s_t_ 2__1_, _2_0_2_0_______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown