Hill v. Oregon State Hospital

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

VICTORIA ELIZABETH BARBARA HILL, No. 6:19-cv-00409-SB Plaintiff, ORDER v. OREGON STATE HOSPITAL, DR. HRISHKESH IYENGAR, and DR. RUBINA GUNDROO in their individual capacities, Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [50] on March 31, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss [37].

The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [50].

Accordingly, Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____S_e_p_t_e_m__b_e_r_ 2_,_ 2__0_2_0______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge