IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LEROY LAMONT WELLS, No. 2:20-cv-00968-JE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

SUE WASHBURN,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation [10] on August 6, 2020, in which he recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl.’s Obj. I, ECF 12; Pl.’s Obj. II, ECF 13. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no

basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’ Findings and Recommendation [10]. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [6] is DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to continue with this case, he must pay the $400.00 filing fee within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___O_c_t_o_b_e_r_ 9_,_ 2__0_2_0_______.

___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge