IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DALE WADE WILSON, No. 2:19-cv-01724-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

COLETTE PETERS, ODOC Director; MICHAEL GOWER, ODOC Assistant Director; MARK NOOTH, Eastside Administrator; MELISSA NOFZIGER, Assistant Inspector General; RON MILES, Correctional Counselor ODOC; and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-6,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [28] on September 25, 2020, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.

Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [28]. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [22] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____O__c_to_b_e__r _3_0_,_ 2_0_2_0_______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge