IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

AHMED G. TURAY, No. 3:20-cv-01084-YY Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [10] on September 4, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [10].

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___N_o_v_e__m_b_e_r_ _1_3_, _2_0_2_0_______.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge