Scholten v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Scholten v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ANNA S.1,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:20-cv-331-MK
v. ORDER
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#7), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1445(9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#7) is adopted. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 10th of November, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non- governmental party in the case. 1 – ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown