IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JENNIFER RIOS, No. 3:19-cv-02016-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

PREMIER AUTOMATION CONTRACTORS, INC.,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [13] on May 20, 2020, in which he recommends that the Court deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [13]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [4] is DENIED. This case is STAYED pending issuance of a final order from the workers’ compensation system regarding Defendant’s status as a noncomplying employer or until further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __N_o_v_e_m__b_e_r_ _2_0_, _2_0_2_0________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge