Walkup v. Division of Child Support

District Court, D. Oregon

Walkup v. Division of Child Support

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KELLI SUE WALKUP and G.J., No. 3:20-cv-01554-SB

Plaintiffs, ORDER

v.

DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, KATE FEDDERSEN, JONATHAN TUCKER, ANDREW LONG, and LOWELL E. JACKSON, JR,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [4] on November 16, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis but dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [4]. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [1] and DISMISSES the Complaint [2] without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____J_a_n_u_a_r_y_ _9_, _2_0_2_1_________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown