Mellerio v. Cain
Mellerio v. Cain
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MICHAEL ALEXANDER MELLERIO,
Petitioner, Civ. No. 2:18-cv-865-MK
v. ORDER
BRAD CAIN, Superintended SRCI; and MARK NOOTH, Superintendent SRCI,
Respondents. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 42), and the matter is now before this court. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 42) is adopted. The Petition is DENIED and this matter is dismissed. As Petitioner has not made a substantial 1 –ORDER
showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of February, 2021.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Reference
- Status
- Unknown