Mellerio v. Cain

District Court, D. Oregon

Mellerio v. Cain

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MICHAEL ALEXANDER MELLERIO,

Petitioner, Civ. No. 2:18-cv-865-MK

v. ORDER

BRAD CAIN, Superintended SRCI; and MARK NOOTH, Superintendent SRCI,

Respondents. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 42), and the matter is now before this court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

(9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 42) is adopted. The Petition is DENIED and this matter is dismissed. As Petitioner has not made a substantial 1 –ORDER

showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2), a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of February, 2021.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Reference

Status
Unknown