IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ALAN L. GALLAGHER, No. 3:19-cv-01342-JR

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

CAPELLA EDUCATION COMPANY and CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, INC.,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 1, 2020, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and dismiss this case with prejudice. F&R, ECF 39. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 41. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report.

(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [39]. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [35] is GRANTED and this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___M_a__rc_h_ _1_,_ 2_0_2_1_________.

___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge